Bull. Soc. Bot. France 35: 390
Each value Trefle shows for Carduncellus cespitosus, with what every source says about it. When sources disagree, the strongest source is shown (how sources are ranked). Values imported before sources were recorded one by one are marked Source not recorded.
Something wrong? Suggest a correction.
| Field | Shown | What the sources say | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Core | |||
| Author | Batt. |
|
Sourced |
| Bibliography | Bull. Soc. Bot. France 35: 390 |
|
Sourced |
| Rank | species |
No source recorded
|
Source not recorded |
| Status | accepted |
|
Sourced |
| Year | 1889 |
|
Sourced |
| Descriptive | |||
| Family common name | Aster family |
No source recorded
|
Source not recorded |
| Observations | Morocco to Algeria |
|
Sourced |
| Morphology | |||
| Vegetable | false |
|
Sourced |